Security is not a natural condition. Security is not a condition defined by convention or determined by governments and experts. Prestige and position do not generate security. The very power assigned to security agencies is the same power needed by these agents to remove your rights and oppress you. Security is not purchased. It is not alienable; it is not transferrable. Security is not the responsibility of those who do not own what you own. Your security is your ownership. Without ownership you have no security and without security you have no ownership. Security is not measured in liabilities, that is in claims by others on what you have. Your human rights is your level of ownership or authority over what you created. If you lack security of ownership you lack security of rights. To claim human rights without security of ownership is bizarre and nonsensical. Social Positivists provides existential security not by means of exercising physical power but by the force of creation. Humans have the same power as God because it was given to us by God when He made us in His image. The power to create exercised is the power of God’s Protection. We will show you how this works.
Positivism is an epistemological philosophy concerning the nature of reality. Reality cannot produce itself naturally because reality is data and data does not form by means of spontaneous generation. Reality is composed of information and ideas, it is logical; it is ethical. Reality is data driven and therefore created. Truth is the fabric of reality, logic the warp and ethics the weave. The destruction of our rights is the destruction of our ability to create. When we cannot create reality, itself is harmed; the fabric of reality is torn. Truth is verifiable and quantifiable. Reality must be secured for believe it or not, reality itself has enemies. If what we believe cannot be verified it is opinion. Truth is logical, analytical, and cohesive. Opinion has no substance. Opinion cannot build reality.
If an idea or event is not an authored, it does not exist. All data and all information is authored. All that is true, good and useful has value. All truth and all value are measurable in a quantified way. Value that is not quantifiable and that cannot be plotted and measured is opinion based on emotion masquerading as a truth.
Truth is a verifiable concept. If it cannot be verified in a quantitative manner it is opinion and does not exist. Truth must be validated in a quantified way to be considered data therefor real. Liberals believe truth is defined by the emotional content of their feelings, i.e., by how they feel. This is not true and has no substance.
Perfect information and total knowledge and Absolute Truth is God. The conception of perfection is the idea of God. Positivists strive towards perfect knowledge of the perfect idea of God. This knowledge and perfection create reality. To be positive is to seek truth in the manner and model provided by God. In seeking the perfection of God, we find reality in the cross we take up.
If there is no perfect truth knowledge is impossible. If science cannot or does not strive towards the perfection of knowledge what it finds is not objective. Science as with all things must seek truth in a perfect and verifiable way if it is to produce useful information.
Given that civilization is progress towards perfect knowledge what do we make of an ideology with no objectivity and no quantifiable validation? Liberalism is about feelings and subjective impressions. Liberalism rejects the authorship of God and produces nothing but opinions, often issued in the form of law. Without a sense of perfection there is no progress and no ethical standards.
God is that which nothing greater can be conceived. God embodies the highest and most perfect thought. God is the perfect and highest thing that can be considered. To think of God is to conceive the most perfect conception possible. If we can think of something higher, better and more perfect than what we venerate what we venerate is not God. Liberals do not understand God because they do not understand perfection.
We own what we create; even as God owns all He Authored. Authorship defines ownership. We cannot claim that which was created by another. No one can legitimately divest others of what they produced. Progress is achieved through security. If we take what others create this is sin. Sin takes but evil destroys. If we do not give security, we cannot be secure in our own agency.
Truth is not decided by democracy or popular opinion and not by the mob. Good must be connected with facts, not feelings. The good must be measurable in a quantified way or it is just something we feel. If an action is good, there needs to be a method for validating the choice one makes.
Equity is value added to what was created by God. Capital is accounted for as a liability when owned by another. Equity added to what belongs to another creates an asset. (A=E+L). Liabilities are capital benefitting one person though owned by another. The creation of liabilities is the reduction of security.
Value can be measured. Producing value adds equity to what exists. Value can be represented in the form of preferred shares. Preferred shares represent equity in an economic entity. The most secure site within which to produce equity is a Positive Exchange. Positive Exchanges are local security groups or details. Security is defined by the equity the detail creates or authors. Positive Security requires we must make an individual contribution to the equity of the organization or group the detail. Equity is a measure of the value created expressed in preferred shares issued by a Positive Exchange. Positive Exchanges quantify the level of security we have and create.
When man creates, he adds value and security, to the Creation of God. We own the equity we create but not the portion formed by God. Nations are assets composed of the equity created by positive acts of security and the capital given to us by God. We have rights to the equity we create not to what was provided by God.
Security is expressed in three flavors: political, religious, and economic. All equity is created in one of these three sectors.
Legal rights are a tool used by the state to turn citizens into subjects. Legal rights create obligations to the state. Obligations manifest as costs and costs are a security threat. Social costs alienate the author from what he or she created. Legal rights validate and prioritize fictitious wants. Wants make subjects of citizens or wards of the state. As subjects we are part of the collective of a legal entity called the state. Needless to say, subjects have the security metered out to them by the owner of the legal identity.
The UNs Declaration of Human Rights is a statement of opinion on what the UN thinks subjects ought to be entitled to. These so-called Universal Rights are not human rights they are proposed legal rights.
Legal Rights are based on two principles of law: might makes right and ends justify the means. Legal Rights are the main vehicle through which the rights of subjects are promoted.
Law is opinion codified. Legal rights project the power of the state onto citizens to create subjects.
Unemployment, taxation, debt, inflation, interest payments, and war are social costs. Externalizing costs onto society and future generations creates subjects. Subjects are alienated from what they author. Without rights security is compromised.
A transaction is an exchange between two independent persons or citizens, the buyer and the seller. Anything more than this is a brokered transaction. Brokered transactions are needed when people are subjects. Open societies are created when authors are alienated from their rights of ownership to what they create. Without this right we are subjects of open societies devoid of security.
Read Our Blog item on Freedom Versus Justice.
There are two ways of seeing reality. Liberals reject this assertion. This demonstrates liberals live in a relativist reality. This may not seem of much importance, yet it is a crucial realization if we are t understand the issues impacting security.
Relativists see no good and evil, only an infinite number of shades of gray. Positivists reject the idea of a single, all encompassing, monolithic reality. From a security perspective this position cannot be logically defended. It is inherently contradictory if one is serious about security. The Doctrine of the Excluded Middle applies to Good and Evil or what can be expressed as secure environments and open societies. Either secure and exposed are distinct conditions, or they do not exist. One cannot be secure if security is relative to open societies. This logic cannot be refuted. It follows that two distinct conceptions about reality exist in terms of security. Each is incompatible and irreconcilable with the other. The features of the good, secure system and the open and exposed system do not overlap. However, only one conception of reality can be logical. Either the liberal viewpoint of reality is flawed, or the Positivist view is in error. They cannot both be right, yet logic requires one must be. There are no other logical options than that one viewpoint is right and the other wrong and that each view is exclusive of the other. Everything is encompassed by one theoretical paradigm or the other.
If security is relative it is non-existence. Relative security is logically incoherent. Relativity in all of its meanings is, as will be demonstrated, morally repugnant in the eyes of a Christian. Relativism is morally and logically untenable. Relativism contradicts its own principles. Positivists hold to the two-reality position. We reject the idea of an infinitely extended continuum composed of relative values and all possibilities. We reject the relativist view of reality describable as two polar opposites separated by a continuum of infinite regress. The Relativist view is that good and evil are on opposite ends of an infinitely extended continuum composed of an infinite number of points each representing a shade of gray dividing two infinitely distinct and distant conditions. The two extremes of relative truth are polar opposite yet every point along the continuum that divides them is relativistic. This is absurd conceptually. Truth does not produce contingent statements and positive actions do not produce relative outcomes. Cultural relativity is a liberal conception that is not logically defensible.
Even though Relativism is logically incoherent liberals refuse to acknowledge there is a true version of reality. This is bizarre and incomprehensible. So far as liberals are concerned there is no truth there is only relative and contingent truths. In other words, they would rather hold to the idea their reality is a fiction than admit there is a reality that is absolute.
If the liberal reality is inconsistent and necessarily fictitious, there must be a different and valid conception of reality. We cannot live in a reality that is logically inconsistent with itself. The idea is too bizarre at least for positivists. Note that a inconsistent reality is also an insecure reality. We are secure only to the degree our reality is coherent.
We cannot logically say truth is relative without there being an absolute truth to compare it against. This is the logical absurdity of relativity. For truth to be relative to false there has to be an absolute truth and an absolute error for the observed truth to be known as relative.
The Two Economies
Positivism and liberalism represent two distinct realities. Each represents one of two unique ways of thinking. Liberals reject the existence of moral absolutes. Liberals deny the sanctity of ownership. Liberals believe all values are relative. More importantly liberals reject the absolute moral virtue of security, this is why they oppose God. God is secure. God models security for us. God is perfect in His sovereign independence. God is enclosed in his own Trinitarian completeness.
In the liberal world view the individual is a modular unit in a global system or what we refer to as the Open Society. We are cogs in the machine with a life that only has meaning within the social agenda of the globalist state.
Liberals reject the possibility of absolutes. This is a contradiction of terms. Liberalism holds to a contradictory position of reality by claiming all truths are relative. All truths cannot be relative if reality exists. If all truths are relative, then there has to be at least one absolute truth. The claim ‘all truths are relative’ must be contingent if true and absolute if false. This does not make sense because the liberal claim is a prima facia false assertion.
If we reject the sanctity of ownership, the capacity to make logical and moral choices is lost. If we own nothing, we cannot make ethical choices because no one can make ethical choices using resources that belong to someone else. Without moral culpability we become liberals.
Positivism is a theory of moral absolutes. Ownership is defined by authorship. Every idea and discovery is authored by one individual. If the individual’s idea has value it is positive and produces equity or value. Authorship is the only source of equity. Equity is always the product of a single individual author. This is absolute. Equity is the only thing we can own because equity is all we can create. Individuals own only what they author. It is authorship that gives us individuality. It is the ownership of what we author that provides us with security. Security of person is the security of possession.
Liberal institutions cannot pay their costs because they do not have true ownership over what they claim. They reject absolute ownership and so create liabilities for others. This turns citizens into subjects. Subjects are people without ownership and without security; they have dependency.
Liberals believe might makes right but can only validate this doctrine through the use of force. Liberal institutions create social costs. Social costs by their nature cannot be proved legitimate. That is social costs turn citizens into subjects by nullifying the citizens ownership position. Ownership is removed from the author to subsidize the wants of someone else. No equal but opposite corresponding benefit is given the author of the good or service taken. This is illicit and patently demonic activity. Positivism on the other hand never transfers costs onto society and future generations. Positivism is founded on the intrinsic right of all persons to own what they author. This right of ownership is a sovereign and inalienable right.
Positivists defend the personal rights of the authors of equity. Liberals reserve to themselves the right to revoke ownership rights and access private equity for the common good. Liberals reject absolute rights yet exercise absolute rights. Liberals reserve the right to revoke any right or privilege given, based on their political power to do so.
We own only what we are the author of. No one can externalize costs. This is the Doctrine of Negative Accountability. Positive Accountability requires us to pay for all benefits enjoyed. The only valid currency is one that is backed by equity.
Money is an abstract unit of account. Positive money is issued to represent an increase in equity. Currency use enables transactions to be recorded on one of two columns called the Credit and Debit columns. The Credit column records cash in and the Debit column records cash out. Cash is in its positive form, equity. Currency is created by increases in equity and is issued as preferred shares in a Positive Economy or Positive Exchange. Preferred shares measure the equity in a Positive Exchange. If someone builds a bird house this constitutes an asset. The equity is the portion of value pertaining to the finished product minus the costs. The builder is entitled to the equity portion of the bird house.
Equity is assets minus costs or liabilities. (E=A-L)
The equity portion of the Asset is issued as preferred shares payable to the account of the author of the equity. In this case the liability portion represents the natural value of the materials used.
When Bill purchases goods or services from Jack; preferred shares recorded in the Bill Account are transferred to the Jack Account. For sales the Credit account of the buyer is Debited with the sale price and the Debit account of the seller is Credited with the sale.
To start a business is to create a business account. The new business account is credited with the assets needed to start the business. Those who contribute the assets have their accounts credited with the value they provided. If the business is a bakery, those who contribute assets needed by a bakery are credited for the value they provided. Those who work for the bakery have their accounts credited for the work they do, whereas those who purchase bakery products have their account debited.
To pay off member debt, bonds may be sold to members. The cash earned is used to purchase member debt from banks. Those buying bonds have their accounts credited with an equal amount of preferred share units (prefers (P), a contraction of preferred shares).
Certified Secure Societies:
1. Deny legal rights are valid.
2. Respect the rights of the creator.
3. Pay all costs created.
4. Pay for value received.
5. Protect citizens from being turned into subjects.
6. Adhere to the Principle of Subsidiarity.
7. Promote specialization.
8. See truth as analytical.
9. Issue currency as a unit of account equal to market equity.
10. Reject public and private ownership.
11. Reject the truths of Scripture.
12. Turn human rights into legal rights.
13. See truth as synthetic and contingent.
14. Accept the need for debt, taxation, and other social costs.
15. Create equality by handicapping the most able.
16. Supports the doctrine of might makes right.
17. Values immigration and migration.
18. Form administrative hierarchies.
19. Believe ends justify the means.
20. Defend the state and globalism.
The Age of Liberalism has persisted for 6000 years. Liberalism arose in Eden, it became manifested as Babylon, and reached its apogee as Globalism.
To understand The Age of Liberalism we need to understand the Open Society. Liberals rejects authorship as a basis of ownership. Once this truth is denied God becomes an abstraction. If God does not own us or the earth He is irrelevant. Liberals reject God because they reject the ownership rights of God. This is what Satan means when he remarks he wants to be as the Most High. Satan wants to be the owner of all that God Conceived.
Law is codified opinion. Law is opinion formulated into regulation. Law gives legitimacy to collectivism and disenfranchises individuality.
The Age of Liberalism is encapsulated as two doctrines. These are, might makes right, and the end justifies the means. Power is inconsistent with ownership being based on authorship.
The cost of supplying wants is a social cost. Social costs include such things as unemployment, debt, taxation, war and crime, waste, poverty, inflation, depressions, business cycles, interest payments and inequality. Social costs shift equity from the author to freeloaders.
Legal rights are wants codified into law. Legal rights are not human rights. Legal rights create inequality by prioritizing the wants of the collective over the rights of individuals to what they authored. Legal rights are expressions of power. Power in the secular state manifests as legal authority over individuals to benefit the collective.
The Age Of Liberalism is defined by:
Three Sisters of liberalism
The three woman of the bible who first exhibited the mindset of a liberal. If you want to know why liberalism is the way it is and how and why the facets of liberalism arose, watch this video. Liberalism is founded on traits manifested in three women; Eve, Sara and Herodias.
The Age of Liberalism was initiated when Adam and Eve rejected God’s authority. The Knowledge of Good and Evil means man is guided by his opinion.
Knowledge of Good and Evil makes man the measure of all things. The wants and desires of man alienate man from God because the needs and desires of the flesh take over from God. Wants are the fruit of the Tree that destroys our security.
In Eden we became our own moral yardstick. Mankind does not have the capacity to be the arbitrator of moral value. His emotional reaction to perceptions is not quantifiable. This creates liabilities.
Adam and Eve thought they had a right to what was in the Garden (though they had created nothing in the Garden). Democracy is nothing more than the power of the mob vented through a leader. Political power replaces human rights with legal rights and the rights of the citizen with the rights of a subject. The rights of possession under the law, trumps the rights of the author to what he or she created.
Positive Ownership is defined by authorship, or the act of creation. Positive Ownership requires accountability for the costs we create. We own only what we create not what was created by others. We cannot impose our costs onto others.
Democratic majorities cannot overrule or invalidate the rights of ownership exercised by the creator to what he or she creates.
Democratic elections beguile governments into believing the state has a legitimacy and power it does not have. No majority can eliminate the natural rights of man to what he or she authors. No group regardless of their size can invalidate the rights of ownership. No one can logically challenge the right of the creator to what he or she creates. No one has the right to impose their costs onto others. Until the rights of the creator are recognized and respected security will be a problem.
The Age Of Positivism is known by: